Added a background of ocean & shells to this older recording for the Photopoem page of my Art & Writings website. An improvement over the plain voice in this one. I worked on this recording (shells & distant tinkling bells are mine) because I thought this poem needed some 'pizzaz.'
(But, yes, I forgot to 'master fade out' & this version is gone because I continued fiddling in garageband & saved a later version... it bothers me, but, ahhhh, it's late... & I did manually 'fade out' each of the six tracks (yes, yes, there are that many)...
Love Letters on Sand Mandalas, 2005..............click to play
(click on this image
to enlarge)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Woman with Flowers 7.1
(7th sketch in series, first iteration of this one) Woman with Flowers Flowers, props upholding the woman. The flowers, fragrant, imaginar...
-
The Buddha says: “ You cannot travel the path until you have become the path itself .” The path is uncertain. Uncertainty is the guiding for...
-
What if relationships are the primary ordering principle? What if the way relationships are ordered clarify, explain, and instruct us on th...
-
"I hope you are all creating every day according to the inner map you were born with. I know it sometimes seems that map is written in ...
i love this one brenda, that is how love feels, the earth moves, and because you suspend normal physical sensations in the act of lovemaking, you can feel it move, the tidal forces and pleasure are all encompassing, and have this oracle dance of motion and pulse, really like the visuals on this one too, all of the layers are so nicely woven here!
ReplyDeleteYour writing evocative, poetic - you've almost written a poem in response. Meaning I love your comment. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteRe-visiting older pieces, and adding to them is a new process, but it can improve the original, or, as you say, create more cohesive interwoven layers.
Brenda, this was so thoroughly "felt." The very ending carried me away with the tide. I loved it.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Liz. I love how the tide is in your comment too :-)
ReplyDelete